[1]任艳楠,姚苗苗,郑博林,等.两种碘化油造影剂行子宫输卵管造影后的结果比较[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(07):684-686.
 REN Yannan,YAO Miaomiao,ZHENG Bolin,et al.Comparison of the effect of two iodized oil contrast agents for hysterosalpingography[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(07):684-686.
点击复制

两种碘化油造影剂行子宫输卵管造影后的结果比较()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
32
期数:
2023年07
页码:
684-686
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect of two iodized oil contrast agents for hysterosalpingography
作者:
任艳楠 姚苗苗 郑博林 李鸿江
Author(s):
REN Yannan YAO Miaomiao ZHENG Bolin LI Hongjiang.
Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian Province 362000, China
关键词:
【关键词】 40%碘化油 超液化罂粟乙碘油 子宫输卵管造影 不孕症
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 比较40%碘化油与超液化罂粟乙碘油用于子宫输卵管造影(hysterosalpingography, HSG)的不良反应以及HSG术后不同时期的自然妊娠率。方法 2019年3月至10月福建医科大学附属第二医院行HSG检查的不孕患者中,288例使用40%碘化油作为对比剂,246例使用超液化罂粟乙碘油作为对比剂。比较两组患者HSG检查过程中的不良反应(对比剂逆流、腹痛、过敏反应),以及HSG术后1年内的自然妊娠情况。结果 在HSG检查过程中,超液化罂粟乙碘油组不良反应发生率低于40%碘化油组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在HSG检查术后,超液化罂粟乙碘油组及40%碘化油组不明原因不孕患者的自然妊娠率均明显提升,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 应用超液化罂粟乙碘油的不良反应发生率低于40%碘化油,但均可提升不明原因不孕患者的自然妊娠率。

参考文献/References:

[1] 石 波,沈玉萍,胡美英,等.子宫输卵管造影1627例分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27:1525- 1526.
[2] 黄杭珍.不孕症流行现状与趋势探讨[J].中医药管理杂志,2016, 24:11- 12.
[3] 子宫输卵管造影中国专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 6:185- 187.
[4] Stacey C,Bown C,Manhire A,et al. HyCoSy:as good as claimed?[J]. Br J Radiol, 2000, 73: 133- 136.
[5] 高一军.子宫输卵管造影术中对比剂逆流的影像学表现及临床分析[J]. 当代医学, 2016, 22:85- 86.
[6] 郭 璐,黄建龙,林朝晖. 子宫输卵管造影发生逆流900例总结分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2017, 26:1610- 1612.
[7] 李玉泽,卑贵光,姜 洪,等. 子宫输卵管造影不良反应及防治措施[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2015, 44:545- 548.
[8] 夏成芳,严建春.两种碘化油造影剂行子宫输卵管造影的效果比较[J]. 实用医学影像杂志, 2002, 3:220- 221.
[9] 刘晓风,刘 琳,王晓力,等. 罂粟籽油毒理学研究与安全性评价[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2014, 29:65- 69,74.
[10] Peart JM, Sim R. Lipiodol hysterosalpingogram: a modified HSG technique to minimize risks associated with lipiodol use[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2020,64:516- 521.
[11] Fang F, Bai Y, Zhang Y,et al. Oil- based versus water- based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Fertil Steril,2018,110:153-160.
[12] Li H, Ren Y, Yan J, et al. Fertility outcome and safety of ethiodized poppy seed oil for hysterosalpingography in 1,053 infertile patients: a real-world study[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2022, 9: 804494.
[13] Dreyer K,van Eekelen R,Tjon-Kon-Fat RI,et al. The therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography in couples with unexplained subfertility: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multi-centre cohort study[J] .Reprod Biomed Online, 2019, 38:233-239.
[14] Wang R,Watson A,Johnson N,et al. Tubal flushing for subfertility[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 10: CD003718.
[15] Johnson JV, Montoya IA, Olive DL. Ethiodol oil contrast medium inhibits macrophage phagocytosis and adherence by altering membrane electronegativity and microviscosity[J]. Fertil Steril, 1992, 58: 511-517.
[16] Izumi G,Koga K,Takamura M,et al. Oil- soluble contrast medium(OSCM) for hysterosalpingography modulates dendritic cell and regulatory T cell profiles in the peritoneal cavity: a possible mechanism by which oscm enhances fertility[J]. J Immunol, 2017, 198:4277-4284.
[17] Dreyer K,van Rijswijk J, Mijatovic V,et al. Oil- based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376: 2043-2052.
[18] Yun AJ, Lee PY. Enhanced fertility after diagnostic hysterosal-pingography using oil-based contrast agents may be attributable to immunomodulation[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2004, 183:1725-1727.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2022-05-24)
(本文编辑:新 宇)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-31