[1]郑 寅,蔡华秀,温咏康,等.经远端桡动脉路径行冠脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性Meta分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(06):533-541.
 ZHENG Yin,CAI Huaxiu,WEN Yongkang,et al.The safety and effectiveness of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial access: a meta-analysis[J].journal interventional radiology,2023,32(06):533-541.
点击复制

经远端桡动脉路径行冠脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性Meta分析()

PDF下载中关闭

分享到:

《介入放射学杂志》[ISSN:1008-794X/CN:31-1796/R]

卷:
32
期数:
2023年06
页码:
533-541
栏目:
心脏介入
出版日期:
2023-06-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The safety and effectiveness of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial access: a meta-analysis
作者:
郑 寅 蔡华秀 温咏康 陈思诚 刘伟斌 曹 竣 裴 芳 曹 刚
Author(s):
ZHENG Yin CAI Huaxiu WEN Yongkang CHEN Sicheng LIU Weibin CAO Jun PEI Fang CAO Gang.
Department of Cardiology, Ganzhou Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province 341000, China
关键词:
【关键词】 鼻烟壶 远端桡动脉 冠脉造影 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【摘要】 目的 通过Meta分析评估经远端桡动脉路径(distal radial access,DRA)行冠脉造影(coronary angiography,CAG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的安全性和有效性。DRA是一个新的手术路径,已发表的一些随机对照试验结果不完全一致,其安全性和有效性仍存在争议。方法 检索2017年1月1日至2022年9月1日发表在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、万方、中国知网、维普数据库的文献,筛选出符合要求的随机对照试验,提取数据后进行Meta分析。结果 检索到537项研究,最终纳入18项随机对照试验进行分析(共7 143例患者)。DRA与桡动脉路径(transradial artery access,TRA)相比,桡动脉闭塞(radial artery occlusion,RAO)发生率更低(RR:0.27,95%CI:0.18~0.39,P<0.001,I2 =10.4%),穿刺部位血肿发生率无统计学差异(RR:0.89,95%CI: 0.67~1.18,P=0.417,I2=12.9%),桡动脉痉挛发生率无统计学差异(RR:0.89,95%CI: 0.50~1.58,P=0.680,I2=72.5%),路径成功率更低(RR:0.93,95%CI:0.89~0.98,P<0.05,I2=93.6%)。部分随机对照试验质量不高为本研究的局限性。结论 与TRA相比,经DRA行CAG和PCI是安全有效的,但是DRA的路径成功率可能更低。

参考文献/References:

[1] Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography. I. A percutaneous transfemoral technic[J]. Radiology, 1967, 89: 815-824.
[2] Kiemeneij F,Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1993, 30: 173-178.
[3] Hamon M,Pristipino C,Di Mario C,et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology[J]. EuroIntervention, 2013, 8: 1242-1251.
[4] Bernat I,Aminian A,Pancholy S,et al. Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention: an international consensus paper[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12: 2235-2246.
[5] Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography(ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI)[J]. EuroIntervention, 2017, 13: 851-857.
[6] Cao G, Cai H, Cao J. Advancement in coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention using the distal transradial artery access in acute coronary syndrome and complex coronary artery disease[J]. Anatol J Cardiol, 2022, 26: 163-171.
[7] Tsigkas G,Papageorgiou A,Moulias A,et al. Distal or traditional transradial access site for coronary procedures: a single-center, randomized study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15: 22-32.
[8] Aminian A,Sgueglia GA,Wiemer M,et al. Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: the DISCO RADIAL trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15: 1191-1201.
[9] Daralammouri Y,Nazzal Z,Mosleh YS,et al. Distal radial artery access in comparison to forearm radial artery access for cardiac catheterization: a randomized controlled trial(DARFORA trial)[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2022, 2022: 7698583.
[10] 欣明花,钟 诚,许峥贵,等. 经远端桡动脉腕背支穿刺途径在冠状动脉介入诊治中的效果及安全性评价[J]. 浙江医学, 2020, 42:1633-1637.
[11] 刘玉文,钱 进,王 能,等. 经远端桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性及安全性研究[J]. 微循环学杂志, 2020, 30:39- 43.
[12] 付小琴,李兴革. 桡动脉远端穿刺在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的整体应用效果及安全性分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19:138-141.
[13] 曾 辉,邱翠婷,郑海军,等. 远端桡动脉入径和经典桡动脉入径冠状动脉造影术后前臂桡动脉闭塞的临床观察[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2021, 49:1314-1316.
[14] Lin Y,Sun X,Chen R,et al. Feasibility and safety of the distal transradial artery for coronary diagnostic or interventional catheterization[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2020, 2020: 4794838.
[15] Sharma A,Razi M,Prakash N,et al. A comparative assessment of dorsal radial artery access versus classical radial artery access for percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized control trial (DORA trial)[J]. Indian Heart J, 2020, 72:435-441.
[16] Vefalt V,Saricam E. The comparison of traditional radial access and novel distal radial access for cardiac catheterization[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2020, 21: 496-500.
[17] Eid-Lidt G,Rivera RA,Jimenez CJ,et al. Distal radial artery approach to prevent radial artery occlusion trial[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 14: 378-385.
[18] Lucreziotti S,Persampieri S,Gentile D,et al. Access- site hematoma in distal and conventional transradial access: a randomized trial[J]. Minerva Cardiol Angiol, 2022, 70: 129-137.
[19] Koledinskiy A,Mikheeva Y,Ogurtsov P,et al. Hospital results of endovascular treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) through distal radial access[J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41.
[20] Koutouzis M,Kontopodis E,Tassopoulos A,et al. Distal versus traditional radial approach for coronary angiography[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2019, 20: 678- 680.
[21] 刘 振,房 美. 经鼻烟壶区远端桡动脉与传统桡动脉径路在冠状动脉介入诊疗中的疗效对比[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2020, 26:3635-3637.
[22] 王 辉,彭文近,刘艳红,等. 老年患者经远端桡动脉与经典桡动脉行冠状动脉诊疗的临床疗效及安全性比较[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 22:377-380.
[23] 杨 林. 经远端桡动脉腕背支穿刺途径在冠状动脉介入诊治中的效果[J]. 健康大视野, 2021:106-107.
[24] 焦安德,霍艳萍. 经鼻烟壶区远端桡动脉与传统桡动脉径路在冠状动脉介入诊疗中的疗效对比[J]. 药店周刊, 2021, 30:147-148.
[25] Wang Y,Tang J,Ni J,et al. A comparative study of TR band and a new hemostatic compression device after transradial coronary catheterization[J]. J Interv Med, 2018, 1: 221-228.
[26] Lee JW,Son JW,Go TH,et al. Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2022, 37: 109-118.
[27] Roh JW,Kim Y,Lee OH,et al. The learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 13217.
[28] 魏显敬,辛丽娜,解泽宙,等. 左桡动脉远端入路冠状动脉介入诊疗术的安全性和可靠性[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2022, 31:1069-1072.
[29] Mori S,Hirano K,Yamawaki M,et al. A comparative analysis between ultrasound-guided and conventional distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2020, 2020: 7342732.
[30] 牛绍乾,张晓晴,汪雁博,等. 经远端桡动脉路径行冠状动脉介入诊疗的Meta分析[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2021, 29:440-445.
[31] 赵明明,薛月芹,王 艳,等. 经远端桡动脉行冠状动脉介入诊疗可行性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2021, 36:1173-1179.
[32] 陈善浆,林 斌,王 军. 经桡动脉远端穿刺行冠状动脉造影的有效性和安全性[J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2020, 20:316-317.
[33] Lu H,Wu D,Chen X. Comparison of distal transradial access in anatomic snuffbox versus transradial access for coronary angiography[J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2020, 23: E407-E410.
[34] Cao J, Cai H, Liu W, et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary angiography or intervention through the distal radial access: a meta-analysis[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2021, 2021: 4371744.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 健,曹 刚,郑 寅,等.经远端桡动脉路径行脑血管造影的安全性和有效性:系统评价和Meta分析 [J].介入放射学杂志,2024,33(04):355.
 WANG Jian,CAO Gang,ZHENG Yin,et al.The safety and effectiveness of cerebral angiography via distal radial access: systematic evaluation and meta-analysis[J].journal interventional radiology,2024,33(06):355.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
(收稿日期:2022-11- 08)
(本文编辑:茹 实)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-26